Sports Reference Blog

The 2018 Hall of Fame Ballot is Going to Be Lit

Posted by Jonah Gardner on January 26, 2017

While the National Baseball Hall of Fame voters didn't agree that there were at least 12 candidates worthy of election this year, they did go ahead and vote in three very deserving candidates. It will be beyond thrilling to watch Jeff Bagwell, Tim Raines, and Ivan Rodriguez, three of the greatest to ever play the game, take their rightful places in Cooperstown this summer.

However, time marches onward and, with this year's voting in the books, it seems like a good time for an early peek at what lies ahead for voters. In short, it looks like the 2018 Hall of Fame Ballot is going to be as exciting, unpredictable, and infuriating as the 2017 voting. I don't envy the voters who face another agonizing year of paring a list of many worthy candidates down to just ten or fewer.

The Likely Inductees

If you're a Montreal Expos fan who's already planning the trip to Cooperstown this summer, you might want to check with your hotel and see if you can get a frequent customer rate in 2018. And if you're a fan of the San Diego Padres, or just really love closers, you might want to start setting aside some money for airfare to New York. That's because, after this year's round of voting, it looks like a near certainty that Vladimir Guerrero and Trevor Hoffman will be headlining the 2018 Hall of Fame Class.

At 74.0% in this year's round of voting, Hoffman only needs to change a few voters' minds in order to be inducted. The order is slightly taller for Vlad, who received 71.7% of the vote, but failure to get in after breaking 70% in his first year on the ballot would be unprecedented. More to the point, once players reach the level of support that Guerrero and Hoffman have, they usually don't have to wait much longer to make the trip to upstate New York.

In fact, the last seven players to break 70% on a ballot, without breaking 75%, were inducted the following year. The player who breaks that streak, Orlando Cepeda, didn't break 70% until his final year on the ballot. He received 73.5% of the vote that year, and was elected by the Veterans' Committee five years later.

So history is very much on Hoffman and Guerrero's side for 2018. You'd also think they will benefit from a somewhat cleared-up ballot, given that three players were voted in this year, and nine have gone in over the last three, but unfortunately that may not be the case.

The New Faces

That's because there's going to be plenty of new faces, many of whom are deserving of induction in their own right. Here's every first-year player who appears on Baseball-Reference's projected 2018 ballot (meaning they retired following the 2012 season with ten or more seasons in MLB and scored at least a ten in the Bill James Hall of Fame Monitor):

Rk Name YoB HOFm ▾
1 Chipper Jones 1st 180
2 Jim Thome 1st 156
3 Omar Vizquel 1st 120
4 Andruw Jones 1st 109
5 Scott Rolen 1st 99
6 Johnny Damon 1st 90
7 Johan Santana 1st 82
8 Carlos Lee 1st 78
9 Francisco Cordero 1st 77
10 Jason Isringhausen 1st 71
11 Chris Carpenter 1st 70
12 Jamie Moyer 1st 56
13 Brad Lidge 1st 48
14 Brian Fuentes 1st 48
15 Livan Hernandez 1st 41
16 Hideki Matsui 1st 36
17 Kevin Millwood 1st 34
18 Aubrey Huff 1st 30
19 Carlos Zambrano 1st 30
20 Kerry Wood 1st 24
21 Orlando Hudson 1st 20
22 Ben Sheets 1st 19
23 Carl Pavano 1st 16
24 Scott Podsednik 1st 15
25 Guillermo Mota 1st 13
26 Adam Kennedy 1st 12
27 Jack Wilson 1st 12
28 Jeff Suppan 1st 11
29 Miguel Batista 1st 10
Provided by View Original Table
Generated 1/25/2017.

As a reminder, a score of 100 or better means that the Monitor ranks the player as likely to reach the Hall of Fame, although in recent years, that hasn't always been the case. Still, I feel relatively confident predicting that at least three players from this group will be inducted at some point.

There's not much point in wasting a lot of time on Chipper Jones: he has an MVP, a batting title, a World Series title, and the only career .300/.400/.500 line by a switch hitter. Mickey Mantle is the only switch hitter in MLB history with a better career than Chipper, according to WAR. He's in.

I'd imagine Jim Thome will eventually be elected as well, although it's getting increasingly difficult to guess how the voters will handle players who hit from power from 1990-2010. Still, there's no evidence of any PED shenanigans on Thome's part, and, while the Jake rated as somewhat hitter-friendly in the 1990s and early 2000s, it's hardly the bandbox that Coors Field was, and thus can't be used to discredit Thome's power numbers the way many have argued against Larry Walker's.

The biggest obstacle to Thome's induction is that, despite the fact that he hit like one of the very best sluggers in the world for the majority of his career, no one really seemed to appreciate it in the moment. Despite a whopping eight seasons with an adjusted OPS+ over 150, as many as Frank Thomas and more than Jeff Bagwell, Thome never finished better than fourth in MVP voting and only has five MLB All-Star Game appearances to his name. If 600 home runs no longer means automatic induction, Thome could be looking at a couple of years of campaigning. Still, I suspect that, as a player who's top 50 in OPS+ all-time and just misses it for WAR among position players, it's only a matter of time.

I said I expect three players to get in, but that was kind of a cheat, because while I expect at least one of Omar Vizquel, Andruw Jones, and Scott Rolen to get in, I'm honestly not sure which one I'd give the best odds to. Of the three, Scott Rolen had the best career WAR. His 70.0 Wins Above Replacement place his career comfortably above that of the average Hall of Fame third basemen (67.5 WAR). Only nine 3B boast a better career WAR than Rolen; seven are in the Hall of Fame, the eighth is Chipper, and the ninth is Adrian Beltre.

If seeing Beltre in the Top 5 all-time among third basemen in both WAR and Jay Jaffe's JAWS system is surprising to you, then you can understand why Rolen is facing an uphill battle. While Thome may have been slightly underrated in his prime, Rolen was almost criminally ignored, only finishing in the Top 20 in MVP voting twice, despite four years in the top 10 in WAR for the National League.

That's because Rolen was one of the best defensive players of his era, but he did it at a position where defense isn't usually valued. From 1990-2015, only two players had more fielding runs (the defensive component of WAR) than Rolen:

Rk Player Rfield
1 Andruw Jones 235.7
2 Adrian Beltre 208.7
3 Scott Rolen 175.4
4 Robin Ventura 153.5
5 Brian Jordan 153.3
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 1/25/2017.

But because he played 3B, Rolen's case among more traditional-minded voters looks weaker than Omar Vizquel's. Vizquel is going to make for a fascinating divide between old-school and new-school voters. Vizquel is an 11-time Gold Glove winner at shortstop, one of the most important defensive positions on the field. Although he never won a title, Vizquel reached two World Series and cultivated a reputation as one of the era's most accomplished defenders. Already, the Ozzie Smith comparisons are forming.

And yet, it's not entirely clear that Vizquel was even on Rolen's level as a defensive contributor, let alone Ozzie's. In that same 1990-2015 fielding runs leaderboard excerpted above, Vizquel ranks 16th, below players, like Jack Wilson and Mark Ellis, who won't be getting anywhere near the Hall of Fame.

Fielding runs doesn't adjust for position; it's just a question of how many runs a player saved with his glove. But defensive WAR does and, by that measure, Vizquel grades out better than Rolen. However, the gap may not be as large as you think:

Rk Player dWAR
1 Ivan Rodriguez 28.7
2 Omar Vizquel 26.8
3 Adrian Beltre 25.5
4 Andruw Jones 24.1
5 Jack Wilson 20.7
6 Scott Rolen 20.6
7 Rey Sanchez 20.5
8 Yadier Molina 20.3
9 Cal Ripken 18.6
10 Craig Counsell 18.5
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 1/25/2017.

So Vizquel has the second highest dWAR of his era, behind only one player who's already going into the Hall. But, that 8-win advantage in the field over Rolen is more than completely erased when you factor in their offensive WAR (and, again, keep in mind that Vizquel gets extra credit for playing a position where the bat doesn't matter as much):

Player oWAR
Scott Rolen 52.1
Omar Vizquel 32.3
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 1/25/2017.

In other words, even though Vizquel contributed more in the field than Rolen, it's not enough to make up the massive gap in hitting performance.

Still, we haven't even gotten to the player who I'd argue has the best case out of the three. I'm looking forward to spending the next ten years online as an unabashed Stan for Andruw Jones' Hall of Fame case. Andruw was one of my absolute favorite players growing up and, in my opinion, he is absolutely a Hall of Famer.

For starters, here's the five players on the 2018 ballot with the best peak seven-year WAR:

Rk Name WAR7 ▾
1 Barry Bonds 72.7
2 Roger Clemens 66.3
3 Curt Schilling 49.0
4 Chipper Jones 46.6
5 Andruw Jones 46.4
Provided by View Original Table
Generated 1/25/2017.

You might notice that players who received over 50% of the vote this year like Mike Mussina and Edgar Martinez are missing from that list (not to mention the duo I've already identified as the most likely additions to Cooperstown). At his peak, Jones was a better player than everyone on this ballot except the two best players of the 1990s, the crazy-underrated Curt Schilling, and a clear first-ballot Hall-of-Famer in Chipper. As the fielding chart in the Rolen section showed, Jones saved more runs with his glove than any player from 1990-2015, and he did it mostly as a centerfielder.

But Jones could also get it done with his bat. He led the NL in home runs in 2005, becoming one of just 27 people to hit 50 or more HRs in a season, and while his rough hitting towards the end of his career dragged down his overall OPS+ to 111, which would be extremely low for a Hall of Fame Centerfielder, he had more seasons at CF with an OPS+ of 125 or better than Hall of Famers like Richie Ashburn and Al Kaline (and only one fewer than Kirby Puckett, who got in on the first ballot).

Andruw Jones' career admittedly burned briefly, but while it did, it was extremely bright. He had as many 7-WAR seasons as Johnny Bench or Robin Yount, as many 6-WAR seasons as Ernie Banks or Jeff Bagwell, and a higher JAWS score than all but nine CFs. My argument is that the Hall of Fame should celebrate the most memorable and exciting players, not just the ones who reach an arbitrary minimum number of hits, homers, or runs batted in. For several years, Andruw Jones was a top 5-10 player in all of baseball and, for a few, he may have even been the best.

Fighting to Stay on the Ballot

The sad fact is that I can imagine Jones falling below 5% next year more easily than I can picture him getting in. The crowded ballot has made for some surprising early exits, like Kenny Lofton (perhaps one of the biggest voting mistakes of this decade, if you trust WAR) and Jorge Posada (whose HoF Monitor score of 98 indicated that he should have polled more like a player on the fringes of eventually being inducted).

But, when two of the top 10 players of all time in WAR can't get in, it tends to crowd out other players with cases that are interesting, if flawed. In addition to Jones, two players who will likely be sweating next year's voting are Johan Santana and Johnny Damon.

Santana's case is similar to Jones' in that he ranks right behind Andruw in 6th place on next year's ballot in peak WAR, thanks to a brief stretch of mind-blowing dominance. From 2004-08, Santana won two Cy Young Awards, registered three more top-five finishes, and racked up 35.4 WAR. Those were Santana's age 25-29 seasons; since 1901, only 11 pitchers have done better from age 25-29 and I'm going to paste the list below because seeing Santana's name alongside these guys is pretty stunning:

Rk Player WAR
1 Walter Johnson 54.2
2 Rube Waddell 43.9
3 Pete Alexander 43.1
4 Pedro Martinez 42.7
5 Roger Clemens 40.2
6 Ed Walsh 39.5
7 Tom Seaver 37.9
8 Christy Mathewson 37.7
9 Fergie Jenkins 36.8
10 Greg Maddux 36.7
11 Sandy Koufax 36.2
12 Johan Santana 35.4
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 1/25/2017.

Yeah. The problem, for Santana, is that those five years are basically his entire case. While he had a couple more good years with the New York Mets, his career was basically over by age-32. It would be virtually unprecedented for a non-reliever to get into the Hall with 2,025.2 career innings pitched or *heavy sigh* 139 wins. Even Santana's 1,988 strikeouts grade out somewhat below average for a Hall of Fame pitcher.

As for Damon, he has more of a long career/accumulation kind of case. His 56.0 career WAR ranks ahead of players like Jeff Kent and Fred McGriff, who got around 15-20% in this year's balloting. However, he ranks 20th in peak WAR, behind other potential first-timers like Jamie Moyer and Carlos Zambrano. Damon has no top-10 MVP finishes to his name, just two All-Star appearances, and no real passionate constituency, given the residual bad blood surrounding his exit in Boston and the fact that he didn't really come into his own as a player until his final couple of years in Kansas City. If a New York Yankees' legend with a higher Monitor score and great numbers at catcher couldn't get a second year on the ballot, I don't see how Damon will.

Returning Favorites

This year's voting brought very good news for three players who've been hanging around the ballot for a while. Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Mike Mussina all cleared 50% for the first time. 2017 was the fifth year for Bonds and Clemens and the fourth for Mussina and the good news for all three is that they're running ahead of where Raines was in his fifth year (48.7%). And while there's certainly examples of players breaking 50% and stalling (Lee Smith, for example, was at 50.6% in 2012 with five years left to go), all three of Bonds, Clemens, and Mussina have stronger cases that seem to be trending in the right direction with the voters.

One guy who definitely isn't trending in the right direction is Curt Schilling. Schilling fell a whopping seven points from the 2016 Hall of Fame voting and it's basically impossible to predict where his vote total will go from here. Was this year a one-time confluence of factors that will be forgotten by the time the next round of voting rolls around? Or did his behavior during the election cross some kind of character clause line for voters that he won't be able to uncross. A lot of it may depend on which side Schilling picks in the most important debate of our time: Never Tweet or Keep Posting.

The Next Raines

Finally, I'll close with a question I've been thinking a lot about in the wake of the 2017 voting: Who will be the next Tim Raines? It's easy to forget now, but for many years, Raines seemed like a long-shot for Cooperstown. Only through an intense lobbying effort, led by Jonah Keri, did Raines finally make it in. Who is the next player that non-voting baseball writers and fans should be rallying around? I'd like to put forth two extremely-worthy candidates, who both need immediate help.

One is Larry Walker. Walker will be in his eighth year on the ballot, which means time is running out for the voters to acknowledge one of the very best hitters in baseball history. Walker's shortcomings are well-known, but the Coors factor tends to be overblown by those arguing against him. By park-adjusted stats like OPS+, Walker still grades out as one of the very best hitters of the 1990s. He'd be just the sixth hitter, not counting Pete Rose or players who are still on the ballot, to break 70 WAR for his career and fail to get in.

But with just 21.9% this year, Larry Walker's chances of induction are pretty remote. And since he has three more chances at it, there's actually another on-the-bubble player whose case is even more pressing than Walker's. That would be Edgar Martinez. The Seattle Mariners DH was one of 2017's most impressive risers, shooting to 58.6% in his eighth year on the ballot. However, he's only going to have two more shots at election.

On the numbers, Edgar sure seems like a Hall of Famer. He ranks ahead of Vlad in career WAR and ahead of Raines and Mussina on the Bill James Monitor. But, of course, there's one major roadblock that's been thwarting Edgar for years: his position.

For many voters, it takes nothing short of Frank Thomas-sized numbers to vote for a career DH. That's fine if you're an extremely small-Hall person, but otherwise, you should take a closer look. As I argued in the post on the 2017 ballot, while his raw counting stats like HRs, RBIs, and hits are borderline for someone who didn't play the field, those numbers are far too dependent on context to hold against Martinez. He was a .300/.400/.500 hitter for his career and he did so with plenty of room to spare. He also excelled at the single most important skill that any hitter, even a DH, can perform: getting on-base. Edgar had a jaw-dropping seven seasons with an OBP of .420 or higher (min. 450 PAs), which puts him on par with players like Mickey Mantle and Wade Boggs. Martinez is 21st all-time in on-base percentage and most of the players ahead of him are already in the Hall of Fame or on their way.

In a way, Martinez makes a nice counterpoint to the discussions we've been having about Raines the last few years. While Raines was a speedy leadoff hitter, Martinez was a power-hitting masher in the cleanup. While Raines is most well-known for his time in the National League on a team with some of the most memorable design schemes of the 1980s, Martinez played the ultimate American League position for one of the ultimate 1990s teams. But both players were slightly under-appreciated in their time, both had career that keep looking better and better the more we learn about how baseball works, and, ultimately, both deserve to be Hall of Famers.

7 Responses to “The 2018 Hall of Fame Ballot is Going to Be Lit”

  1. Bob Says:

    My only complaint is your comment comparing Andruw Jones to Al Kaline. First off, Kaline was a RF, not a CF (except for a few years) and has way more seasons with an OPS + higher than 125 than Jones does.

  2. Orlando Mon Says:

    Baseball is the only sport left for me that seems to maintain its integrity. It is my sincere hope that no players that have used, or are suspected of using, PED's, be allowed into the HOF. Bonds, Clemons and others must pay for their actions by never entering the HOT unless they purchase a ticket like any normal fan.

  3. Dood Says:

    Unfortunately to some, I have a very open policy to inclusion. I have a bit of issue with PED use, but I think that 30 years from now, everyone will wonder what all the fuss was about today. But more importantly, I'm all in favor of players like Al Oliver, Dave Parker, Jack Morris, & Vada Pinson getting elected. There are so many players already in who pale in comparison to players like this. Why isn't there a weeding out process? You remove some of the guys who don't belong, and then I won't have any issue with Harold Baines not getting in......

  4. FinnMcCool25 Says:

    I think the JAWS rating system is the best "single stat" measurement for HOF induction in that it takes into account both longevity and peak (I assume that WAR is a viable measurement, even though I think its defensive components need lots of work). At a minimum, its a great place to start the discussion.

    Looking at eligible former players, I would have no problem casting my vote (if I had one) for the following (note that I am leaving the PED-takers -- Palmeiro, Bonds, Ramirez, and Clemens -- off my list. Its my line in the sand):

    - Jim Thome
    - Chipper Jones
    - Scott Rolen
    - Edgar Martinez
    - Alan Trammell
    - Larry Walker
    - Curt Schilling
    - Mike Mussina

    All of the above have a greater JAWS rating than the average HOFer at their position. I'm a "small Hall" guy, but still think if you were to throw out some of the "undeserving" HOFers, the average JAWS would not be dramatically affected (probably mostly for SS and C). I absolutely would NOT vote for Vizquel, Guerrero, or Hoffman. I liked each of them as ballplayers, but I just don't see them as HOF-worthy and JAWS backs me up.

    There should be some way to cast a HOF vote in favor of keeping a player on the ballot, but not necessarily for induction at this time. To have someone lose HOF considerations solely because they retired in a crowded year seems horribly unfair. I don't think Posada should be in the Hall, but as you say, he deserved better than a one-and-done. We need the Veterans Committee (or whatever its called now) to save deserving HOFers like Bobby Grich, Lou Whitaker, Graig Nettles, maybe Ken Boyer.

  5. Comfort_Eagle Says:

    Thank you, SR blog man, for becoming a crusader for Andruw Jones. He, along with Willie Mays, is arguably the greatest defensive CFer in baseball history.
    What I am interested to see is what will come of these new committees from this year, especially the Today's Game one. The best player on that ballot was of course McGwire (who is 17th in JAWS among first basemen), who, like the others, didn't even get close. Personally I'd put him in on the sole facts that a) he broke Maris' record first, and b) his AB/HR is the lowest in history (10.61), a full AB ahead of Babe Ruth (11.76). Just incredible.

  6. Dood Says:

    I agree with this analysis, but then I think Al Oliver & Dave Parker belong, so what do I know? I also think that there should be a removal process for those who don't belong anymore.

  7. mls all star game 2017 tickets Says:

    Each manager could designate a position player who will be eligible for game re-entry if
    the final place player is injured or ejected.