Sports-Reference.com Blog

All of our blogs are closing down and moving to our main website blog. Any news, updates and announcements will happen there.

Just a quick note to let everyone know there will be a brief site downtime at 4AM EST tomorrow morning. As always, send us an e-mail if you have any questions or comments, and hopefully everything will go smoothly with minimal inconvenience to all.

OK, I’ve gotta toot our own vuvuzela for a second here: I just found out that the Sports-Reference family of sites has been named to TIME Magazine‘s list of the 50 Best Websites for 2010! It’s a great honor for us, and a thrill to know that our users get so much enjoyment & utility out of the sites. Here’s to being your favorite sports stats destination for many years to come…

I am pleased to announce the launch of College Football at Sports-Reference.com, the latest addition to the Sports Reference family of web sites. We have had plans to launch a college football site for quite some time, but for one reason or another we always ran into roadblocks, most of them data-related. However, we now have a college football database that we believe to be second-to-none. Let me tell you a little bit about what the site does (and does not) have:

Read the rest of this entry »

ESPN’s Peter Keating has started a new blog focusing on statistics and analytics in sports. He’s kicked off his blog with several interesting posts about research regarding the Olympics.

– What causes Olympic records to fall?

The key to determining whether or not something essential is changing in peak athletic performance is to try somehow to untangle basic talent from technology, doping and other external forces that disrupt the progression of world records….So what was behind this progress? “Perhaps the most important reason is simple,” Berry wrote. “The world population has more than tripled [since the start of the modern Olympics].”…Which means everything else — training, technology, doping — accounts for a distinct minority of the variation in world records. As Berry wrote: “Athletes are not getting better, nor are they better trained — there are just more of them.”

– How has figure skating judging reform affected scoring? The law of unintended consequences makes an appearance, and it isn’t pretty.

– How did the prognosticators do in picking Olympic winners? Keating discusses the different systems and their potential weaknesses.

– He also discusses some of my work on this blog.

So, if the Olympinomics posts here have interested you, be sure to check out Peter’s blog. And after the Olympics, keep an eye out for more interesting analytical discussions regarding other sports.

I am pleased to announce the launch of College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com, the latest addition to the Sports Reference family of web sites. We have had plans to launch a college basketball site for quite some time, but for one reason or another we always ran into roadblocks, most of them data-related. However, thanks to the efforts of researcher extraordinaire Kevin Johnson, we now have a college basketball database that we believe to be second-to-none. Let me tell you a little bit about what the site does (and doesn’t) have:

Read the rest of this entry »

The 1998 Games in Nagano changed the landscape of international hockey forever because they were the first Olympics in which NHL players were allowed to compete under their countries’ flags. As a result, Olympic hockey quickly became the most prestigious non-Stanley Cup tournament in the sport because it combined the game’s greatest players with some of its most storied rivalries on a stage few events could match. In other words, for all intents and purposes, the modern era of international hockey began in 1998.

Read the rest of this entry »

In my previous Olympinomics posts, I have looked how the age of winners has differed across sport and gender. The general findings indicate that athleticism tends to generate younger performance peaks and that women tend to peak before men. But, what about time?

Read the rest of this entry »

In case you haven’t been following the action so far, the Canadian Men’s Curling rink is scary dominant in these 2010 Olympics. In our database we have the results of all Olympic curling competitions since 1998 (when the IOC added the sport to the Games), and Canada’s performance so far has been off the charts. Look at the curling percentages (the % of the time the player accomplishes what the skip called for before the shot) for Canada’s regulars in the tournament:

Read the rest of this entry »

Fellow GMU alum Scott Beaulier has a theory as to why there are no good Scandinavian figure skaters.

[T]he Soviet Union and Communist Bloc countries crowded out the Scandinavians in skating events. Why? Because highly centralized economies in the Eastern Bloc had an incentive to focus production on more obvious, big outputs. Things like state-of-the-art ice rinks and basketball courts were visible results of central planning that the leaders could point to as deliverables (the machine-like Soviet boxer from Rocky IV symbolizes this point); focusing more resources on skiing (both downhill and cross-country) and running–even if it produced more gold medals–wouldn’t provide the same visible results in the way of infrastructure improvements and big public projects.

By pouring money into skating, hoops, and hockey, the Soviets became pretty strong in these areas (at a high cost, of course!). Their success in these sports isn’t all that surprising: centrally planned economies can do a decent job at producing a few particular end products. A 1993 paper by Tollison and Shughart titled “Going for Gold” (Blackwell subscription required) seems to support this thesis.

The rational response for Scandinavian countries was to focus more of their energies on the sports they have a comparative (and perhaps a geographic) advantage: skiing, ski jumping, etc.

Read the rest of this entry »