Sports Reference Blog

Archive for the 'Pro-Football-Reference.com' Category

Redesign: Team and League Logos Courtesy SportsLogos.net

19th June 2016

See SportsLogos.net for historical and current sports logos

Chris Creamer does amazing work at SportsLogos.net and I've been wanting to work with him for quite a while to put examples of past and current logos on our sites.  So when our 2016 redesign got underway, we worked out an agreement that we could use copies of his aggregated logos on our site.

We also realize that many historical logos show offensive representations of various ethnic groups and peoples that were commonplace in their time and in American society. These representations are wrong now and were wrong then. We present them, as we do all of our facts, to educate and illuminate, and these prejudices have been an unfortunate part of the history of the sports we all enjoy and love.

Obviously, we do not own these logos and cannot give you permission to use them. We use them under a fair use argument. We use small resolution images, which do not impact the economic viability of the logos for their owners. And we provide them for educational purposes only. It's up to you to know the relevant intellectual property law and, since I'm not a lawyer, this is clearly not legal advice.

Enough with the disclaimers. Check out some old-time teams for some old-time logo goodness.

Posted in Announcement, Baseball-Reference.com, Basketball-Reference.com, CBB at Sports Reference, CFB at Sports Reference, FBref, General, Hockey-Reference.com, Pro-Football-Reference.com, Redesign | Comments Off on Redesign: Team and League Logos Courtesy SportsLogos.net

Player and Team Elo Rater Shutting Down

3rd June 2016

We have decided to remove the team and player Elo Rating pages. We had high hopes for the raters when we launched them but over the years they have too often become a test tube for online campaigns to elevate Dallas Cowboys or push down Los Angeles Lakers to a degree that we don't have any faith that they represent actual general user opinions on the relative quality of players or teams.

These pages will be removed as we launch our redesigned sites this summer beginning with hockey in a week or two.

Posted in Announcement, Baseball-Reference.com, Basketball-Reference.com, CBB at Sports Reference, CFB at Sports Reference, Hockey-Reference.com, Olympics at S-R, Pro-Football-Reference.com | 33 Comments »

A Round-By-Round Look At the Draft

28th April 2016

After months of shuttle runs, bench presses, and anonymous sources attacking the culinary skills of 22-year-olds, the time has come for the 2016 NFL Draft. For some franchises, this is an exciting time. For others, it's an annual, Groundhog Day-esque nightmare. And for Pats fans, it's a good night to catch up on The Americans or Game of Thrones.

A lot of NFL conventional wisdom relates to the importance of taking certain players in certain rounds. Some people think you should draft interior lineman in later rounds. Others suggest that wide receivers taken in the 1st Round tend not to succeed.

So, to get ready for tonight, let's break the draft down by round, in order to examine two questions: Which teams have drafted the best in each round, and which positions are good targets in each round. Read the rest of this entry

Posted in Announcement, Draft, Pro-Football-Reference.com | Comments Off on A Round-By-Round Look At the Draft

2016 NFL Draft Features

27th April 2016

With the NFL Draft rapidly approaching (thus bringing an close to the endless months of draft prognostications), now might be a good time to point out all the draft resources we have available at Pro Football Reference. You can check out:

Hopefully these are of some assistance to you as you're tuned into the draft wondering if your team is going to pick the next Peyton Manning or.. not.

Posted in Announcement, Data, Draft, History, Play Index, Pro-Football-Reference.com | Comments Off on 2016 NFL Draft Features

How to Tell If Your Team Just Drafted a QB Bust

21st April 2016

The range of outcomes when taking a QB with the first or second pick in the NFL Draft is enormous. This year's Super Bowl, a matchup of 2 QBs drafted with the 1st overall pick in their respective Drafts, showed just how high the ceiling can be for teams who draft a QB early. And, on the other hand, the Rams drafted a QB with the #1 pick just six years ago; now they've traded six picks, including two in the First Round, for the chance to do so again.

With the LA Rams and Philadelphia Eagles trading a lot for the right to pick first and second, it's exceedingly likely the first two players off the board will both be QBs. If either franchise nails the pick, they could be on the same path that took the Carolina Panthers to the Super Bowl this year. If they miss, we'll probably be seeing them back here in a few years. Read the rest of this entry

Posted in Announcement, CFB at Sports Reference, Draft, Pro-Football-Reference.com | 4 Comments »

NFL Combine Results Added to Pro Football Reference

26th February 2016

We're happy to announce that we've added NFL Combine results since 2000 to Pro Football Reference. Tables showing results for each season are available in our NFL Draft section, but we're most proud of the new Play Index tool we've created with this data. Our new NFL Combine Results Finder allows users to run customized queries through combine results since 2000. For instance, you can run searches like:

The above is a small sampling of what is possible. You can also slice, dice and sort by spans of years, heights, weights, positions, team drafted by, college and whether or not the player appeared in the NFL.

2016 NFL Combine Results will be added once the combine is over.

If you have any questions or comments, please let us know.

Posted in Announcement, Data, Draft, Features, History, Play Index, Pro-Football-Reference.com | Comments Off on NFL Combine Results Added to Pro Football Reference

NFL Cap Hits Added to Pro Football Reference

22nd February 2016

One of the most common terms searched for on Pro Football Reference is "salary." Since we believe in giving the people want they want, we've gone ahead and added some of this data. We've created a page showing 2015 cap hits, and have also added cap hits to the 2015 team roster pages. We do not quite have full coverage. 1,979 players played in an NFL game in 2015. We have cap hits for 1,777, which is just shy of 90% coverage. We will update with 2016 cap figures as they become available.

Posted in Announcement, Data, Features, Pro-Football-Reference.com | Comments Off on NFL Cap Hits Added to Pro Football Reference

Try Our New Passer Rating Calculator

18th February 2016

We have added an NFL Passer Rating Calculator to our frivolities page which will allow users to calculate NFL passer ratings on the fly. All you need to know to calculate a passer rating are attempts, completions, yards, touchdowns and interceptions. A "perfect" rating comes out to 158.3.

Posted in Announcement, Features, Pro-Football-Reference.com, Statgeekery | Comments Off on Try Our New Passer Rating Calculator

Search by Year and Team Name

17th February 2016

We'd like to briefly announce a cool search enhancement we've added to Pro-Football-Reference for users who quickly want to access season info and stats for an old team. For instance, say you want info on the 1985 Bears. You used to have to go the Bears franchise encyclopedia and select 1985. Now you can just type "1985 Bears" into the search box and go directly to their page. Go ahead and give it a shot. We'll wait. It will work for any valid combination of year and team nickname. We hope you enjoy this new feature and please let us know if you encounter any issues.

Posted in Announcement, Features, Pro-Football-Reference.com | Comments Off on Search by Year and Team Name

Super Bowl 50 Preview!

5th February 2016

In case you haven't heard, there is a football game this Sunday. Will this year's be another classic Super Bowl? A blowout? Let's dig into the numbers and see how the Broncos and Panthers look going into this game.

One thing to note about this year's Super Bowl is that SRS, our method of measuring team strength, didn't really think either team would make it this far. The Panthers ranked 6th in the NFL this year and 3rd in the NFC, behind the 2 teams they faced in the playoffs. Denver was 9th, with SRS putting them on par with Minnesota. Interestingly, this is the first Super Bowl matchup without a team that finished in the Top 5 in SRS. Of course, a high SRS ranking isn't necessarily a guarantee of a better game. The last time the #1 team played the #2 team, it was Seattle vs Denver in 2013. Denver's lowish ranking isn't particularly historic either; the Giants were 11th and 13th in 2007 and 2011, and the Cardinals were 21st in 2008.

That said, both teams did come out well in SRS on one side of the ball or the other. In terms of defensive SRS, the Broncos were 3rd, behind only Seattle and Cincy. Perhaps more surprisingly, given that they were only 13th in yards per play, the Panthers were 2nd in offensive SRS.

Denver doesn't look like any Peyton Manning team you've seen in a Super Bowl before, and certainly not the Broncos team that was just here two years ago. That team had an eye-popping 14.1 offensive SRS and a negative defensive one. This year's Broncos also averaged 5.39 yards per play, the lowest total by a Peyton Manning led attack since 2002 (for simplicity's sake, I included the games that Osweiler started).

So what did Denver need from Manning when he started? To protect the ball. If you've missed the gunslinger/game manager debate, Peyton Manning's 2015 record lets us party like it's 2009. In games where Manning threw 0 or 1 interception, the Broncos were 6-0:

Passing
Date Opp Result Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD Int Rate Y/A
2015-09-13 BAL W 19-13 24 40 60.00 175 0 1 59.9 4.38
2015-09-17 KAN W 31-24 26 45 57.78 256 3 1 86.9 5.69
2015-09-27 DET W 24-12 31 42 73.81 324 2 1 101.7 7.71
2015-11-01 GNB W 29-10 21 29 72.41 340 0 1 96.9 11.72
2016-01-17 PIT W 23-16 21 37 56.76 222 0 0 74.4 6.00
2016-01-24 NWE W 20-18 17 32 53.13 176 2 0 90.1 5.50
Provided by Pro-Football-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 2/5/2016.

 

I left off the Week 17 game where he came in after halftime, but in that game, which Denver also won, he didn't throw a pick. In contrast, when Manning does get picked off 2 or more times, Denver is just 3-2:

Passing
Date Opp Result Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD Int Rate Y/A
2015-10-04 MIN W 23-20 17 27 62.96 213 1 2 68.9 7.89
2015-10-11 OAK W 16-10 22 35 62.86 266 0 2 62.3 7.60
2015-10-18 CLE W 26-23 26 48 54.17 290 1 3 53.3 6.04
2015-11-08 IND L 24-27 21 36 58.33 281 2 2 78.6 7.81
2015-11-15 KAN L 13-29 5 20 25.00 35 0 4 0.0 1.75
Provided by Pro-Football-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 2/5/2016.

 

Manning keeping his interceptions down will be a vital for Denver's gameplan, but that 3-2 record even with multiple INTs shows that who's in charge here. This Denver team is strong enough defensively to withstand a bad day from Manning...as long as they can control the short pass. If we define short passes as throws under 15 yards, then in Denver wins, opposing QBs have averaged just 5.5 yards per attempt on short passes. They've also put up 0.7 TDs per game vs 0.7 INTs when they throw short, for a passer rating of 77.3.

Compare that to the line opposing QBs put up on short passes when they win: 6.3 yards per attempt, 1.5 TDs per game, 0.3 INTs per game, and a 96.0 passer rating. Those numbers match or come close what the league averages on short passes. For Denver to succeed, they need their defense to take away short routes.

Can they do that to Cam? His 101.8 passer rating on short throws was 6th this year. However, the guy who finished one spot above him just had a day where he went 23-45 and had a passer rating of 61.7 on short throws.

Denver also needs to suppress scoring in general. When Broncos games went under the Vegas Over/Under, Denver was 9-1. That's the best record on unders of any team this year:

under

Record on Unders in 2015

On the other hand, they were 5-3 when the score went over or pushed, similar to how the Jets did:

over or pushd

Comparing the Broncos' performance to a team with Ryan Fitzpatrick at QB brings us back to the elephant in the room: Peyton Manning. According to Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt, which adjusts raw y/a to allow for INTs, TDs, and sacks, Manning was the worst qualified QB in the NFL this year.

However, the problem is most pronounced on 3rd down. Now, QBs in general do worse on 3rd down; for example, here's how they did in 2015:

Passing
Down Cmp Att Cmp% Yds Y/A TD Int Rate ANY/A
1st 4640 7213 64.3 51135 7.1 267 157 88.5 6.5
2nd 4105 6349 64.7 43187 6.8 314 129 92.3 6.5
3rd 3051 5153 59.2 33127 6.4 258 152 82.6 5.6
4th 178 334 53.3 1916 5.7 28 19 74.6 4.6
Provided by Pro-Football-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 2/5/2016.

 

This is true of Manning, who has a career passer rating of 88.0 on 3rd down, vs 96.0 in all situations. But this year he was worse. Much worse:

Screen Shot 2016-02-05 at 12.29.52 PM

To put that in perspective, the last QB to have a passer rating of 57.3 in a season (setting the minimum at 120 pass attempts) was Josh Freeman in 2013. Other people who appear on that list: Ryan Leaf, JaMarcus Russell. If you prefer AY/A, Manning's performance on 3rd downs is 2010 Matt Moore-esque.

You don't need me to tell you that this isn't good, but you may need me to tell you that this is especially not good against Carolina. The Panthers faced the 6th most passes on 3rd down this year. They gave up 1st downs on 38.8% of them, a not particularly impressive number that ranks in the top half of the league. But that was against QBs who were not Peyton Manning and, therefore, almost certainly had a better passer rating on 3rd down. If Manning is stuck in passing situations on 3rd down, Denver's offense is probably sunk.

From Carolina's perspective, the key battle may involve turnovers. All teams do better when they win the turnover battle but Carolina A.) won the turnover battle a lot and B.) did very, very well when they did. Here's how many games each team had where their turnover margin was +1 or better and how they fared when that happened (including the playoffs):

 

Rk Tm Year W L T W-L% Count
1 Carolina Panthers 2015 13 0 0 1.000 13 Ind. Games
2 Green Bay Packers 2015 8 3 0 0.727 11 Ind. Games
3 Kansas City Chiefs 2015 9 2 0 0.818 11 Ind. Games
4 Cincinnati Bengals 2015 9 1 0 0.900 10 Ind. Games
5 Pittsburgh Steelers 2015 9 1 0 0.900 10 Ind. Games
6 New York Giants 2015 4 5 0 0.444 9 Ind. Games
7 Arizona Cardinals 2015 8 0 0 1.000 8 Ind. Games
8 Denver Broncos 2015 8 0 0 1.000 8 Ind. Games
9 New England Patriots 2015 8 0 0 1.000 8 Ind. Games
10 Seattle Seahawks 2015 4 4 0 0.500 8 Ind. Games
11 Washington Redskins 2015 5 3 0 0.625 8 Ind. Games
12 Buffalo Bills 2015 6 1 0 0.857 7 Ind. Games
13 Detroit Lions 2015 3 4 0 0.429 7 Ind. Games
14 Minnesota Vikings 2015 6 1 0 0.857 7 Ind. Games
15 New York Jets 2015 7 0 0 1.000 7 Ind. Games
16 Oakland Raiders 2015 5 2 0 0.714 7 Ind. Games
17 St. Louis Rams 2015 4 3 0 0.571 7 Ind. Games
18 Indianapolis Colts 2015 5 1 0 0.833 6 Ind. Games
19 Houston Texans 2015 6 0 0 1.000 6 Ind. Games
20 Miami Dolphins 2015 4 2 0 0.667 6 Ind. Games
Rk Tm Year W L T W-L% Count
21 New Orleans Saints 2015 4 2 0 0.667 6 Ind. Games
22 Philadelphia Eagles 2015 5 1 0 0.833 6 Ind. Games
23 San Francisco 49ers 2015 2 4 0 0.333 6 Ind. Games
24 Atlanta Falcons 2015 3 2 0 0.600 5 Ind. Games
25 San Diego Chargers 2015 2 3 0 0.400 5 Ind. Games
26 Chicago Bears 2015 2 2 0 0.500 4 Ind. Games
27 Jacksonville Jaguars 2015 2 2 0 0.500 4 Ind. Games
28 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 2015 4 0 0 1.000 4 Ind. Games
29 Cleveland Browns 2015 1 2 0 0.333 3 Ind. Games
30 Dallas Cowboys 2015 1 2 0 0.333 3 Ind. Games
31 Tennessee Titans 2015 2 1 0 0.667 3 Ind. Games
32 Baltimore Ravens 2015 2 1 0 0.667 3 Ind. Games
Total 161 55 0 .745 216
Provided by Pro-Football-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 2/5/2016.

Carolina is the 22nd team since the merger to post a turnover margin of +1 or better in 13 games or more and only 7 other teams on that list went undefeated every time they won the turnover battle. But the Broncos were also undefeated when they won the turnover battle, going 8-0.

The Broncos have also had the best rushing defense in the NFL this year. They're going to need it. Counting the playoffs, the Panthers had a rushing yard margin (in other words, rushing yards for minus rushing yards allowed) of 1,025, the most in the league and one of the 15 best since 2006. If Denver does take away the short passing game, Carolina will need to dominate the ground to win.

Another key for the Panthers this season: their excellent starting field position. The Chiefs were the only team with better starting field position than the Panthers, whose average starting spot was a little past their 30 yard line. When they started at their own 30 or better, Carolina scored 65% of the time.

Interestingly, this may be a problem that Denver is equipped to handle. Their average defensive drive started on their opponent's 29.5, the 3rd worst average starting field position for a defense in the NFL. Despite spotting teams more yards than almost any other defense, they still only allowed scores on 28% of drives.

That makes sense, given that the Broncos featured an elite defense supporting an average-at-best offense. In the end, the story of the game may come down to this. Here's the NFL's leading offenses in points per drive:

 

 

And here are the leading defenses:

 

 

Do you see the problem for the Broncos? While Carolina makes the top 5 on both lists, the Broncos are 24th in points per drive. The only reason they rank higher than that in points for is that Denver is 4th in number of drives, but the faster they play the more drives they'll create for Carolina's elite scoring offense.

To bring this full circle, SRS has the Panthers as 2.3 point favorites to win this game, below the Vegas line of 5.5. In other words, we could be in for a much closer game than people are expecting. Still, on paper, Carolina's well-rounded construction seems to give them an advantage over Denver's unbalanced team.

Lastly, a few historic notes:

-If the Broncos win, their Super Bowl record will improve to 3-5, meaning either way, they would no longer be the team with the worst Super Bowl record among the ones who have won at least 1.

-Carolina, on the other hand, would become the 20th team to win a Super Bowl. They would also be the most recently formed team to win a Super Bowl (unless you decide to count the Ravens, like this table does since that team's Cleveland history belongs to the Browns franchise).

-Cam Newton would be the 15th QB to win a Super Bowl in his first five seasons

-Peyton Manning, on the other hand, would be the oldest QB to win a Super Bowl. The current record holder is John Elway, who was 38, a full year younger than Manning, when he won Super Bowl XXXIII.

-Ron Rivera would be the 3rd person to win a Super Bowl as a player and a coach. The other two were Rivera's HC for his Super Bowl win, Mike Ditka, and Manning's, Tony Dungy.

-That note needs a subnote, which is that Tom Flores was on the Chiefs team that won Super Bowl IV, but didn't play in the game

-Riverboat Ron would also be the 3rd coach to lost a Super Bowl as Offensive or Defensive Coordinator and win as Head Coach, after Sean Payton and Mike Shanahan. The QB who beat DC Rivera? Peyton Manning

-Most of the career Super Bowl records are out of Manning's reach, but he does have an outside shot at passing Troy Aikman for the best career Super Bowl completion percentage. If things go really south, he could also make a run at John Elway's record for the most INTs in a Super Bowl.

Before the game, don't forget to check out our infographic about gambling on the Super Bowl and popular bets. We also made a list of the 14 Biggest Plays in Super Bowl History, as judged by our win probability model. And if you don't follow Pro-Football-Reference on Twitter, where it's @pfref, you definitely should before Sunday. We'll be on all evening, giving live updates on the game, answering your questions about stats and Super Bowl History, and cracking wise about the commercials.

Posted in Announcement, Pro-Football-Reference.com | Comments Off on Super Bowl 50 Preview!