<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playoff Seedings Now Up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/</link>
	<description>Sports Statistics Easier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/comment-page-1/#comment-22834</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/?p=1360#comment-22834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, you&#039;re right.. I was misreading that. It should be fixed now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you're right.. I was misreading that. It should be fixed now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C.</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/comment-page-1/#comment-22831</link>
		<dc:creator>John C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/?p=1360#comment-22831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that&#039;s the case. I think the sweep tiebreaker applies if one team has swept the other two or one team has lost to the other two.

http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures

&quot;2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)&quot;

It doesn&#039;t say anything there about all three clubs having to play each other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think that's the case. I think the sweep tiebreaker applies if one team has swept the other two or one team has lost to the other two.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" rel="nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures</a></p>
<p>"2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)"</p>
<p>It doesn't say anything there about all three clubs having to play each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/comment-page-1/#comment-22826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/?p=1360#comment-22826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head-to-head tiebreaker would only apply if all three teams had played each other, so while the Vikings have lost to both Tampa and Seattle, because Tampa &amp; Seattle haven&#039;t played it doesn&#039;t come into effect and they instead win the tiebreaker based on conference record.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The head-to-head tiebreaker would only apply if all three teams had played each other, so while the Vikings have lost to both Tampa and Seattle, because Tampa &amp; Seattle haven't played it doesn't come into effect and they instead win the tiebreaker based on conference record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C.</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/comment-page-1/#comment-22825</link>
		<dc:creator>John C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/?p=1360#comment-22825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems to me that you&#039;ve got the tiebreaker wrong in the NFC. Minnesota loses the head-to-head sweep tiebreaker to Seattle and Tampa Bay, don&#039;t they?

And then the process begins anew for Seattle vs. Tampa, which Seattle wins on conference record (4-4 vs. 3-4).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that you've got the tiebreaker wrong in the NFC. Minnesota loses the head-to-head sweep tiebreaker to Seattle and Tampa Bay, don't they?</p>
<p>And then the process begins anew for Seattle vs. Tampa, which Seattle wins on conference record (4-4 vs. 3-4).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Growcott</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/comment-page-1/#comment-22781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Growcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/?p=1360#comment-22781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly, we have been waiting for about 3 years for Team Streak Finders and Player Streak Finders.

Can you please make this a priority.  Your NBA site has had this feature for some time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, we have been waiting for about 3 years for Team Streak Finders and Player Streak Finders.</p>
<p>Can you please make this a priority.  Your NBA site has had this feature for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave D</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2012/11/playoff-seedings-now-up/comment-page-1/#comment-22773</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/?p=1360#comment-22773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[next up...team streak finders for the PI (what&#039;s taking so long?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>next up...team streak finders for the PI (what's taking so long?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
